Many cartoonists make the mistake of believing that there is a Webtoon Safe Playground Policy on some other site than their own. This isn’t true. Every site has its own set of policies, but there is no such thing as a Webtoon Safe Playground Policy.
Cartoonists should not be using the cartoons or their content to endorse products for business purposes, although cartoonists who are being paid for their cartoons should never endorse products themselves. Cartoonists who want to use their cartoons in promotional activities, but do not want to use their cartoons to endorse a specific product, can use the terms “free drawing” instead of “brand endorsement.” To do this, they must state clearly that the product in question is not sponsored by them and does not have their approval. In many cases, this will save the cartoonist from any legal problems, such as having to change the cartoon or disown it.
It has come to our attention that a certain webtoon site has made some very specific claims that are not true and would imply that all webtoons are somehow “tainted.” These claims include “Webtoon Online: Comic Book to Sell Or Endorse?” On the webtoon site, an author goes on to say: 토렌트 접속주소
Since so many people come to these Webtoons from TV, this is a pretty blatant attempt to sell “something” to a very large number of users. The writer is obviously being deceptive and trying to steer people toward something.
This author states that webtoons are “from TV.” In fact, that statement is true, as many webtoons come from movies, but not all webtoons are movie versions of comics. Most webtoons are entirely original webcomics.
Many webtoons contain animated commercials or infomercials, which are completely inappropriate for children. Additionally, you are free to read the comic and see what it is about, as long as you don’t purchase the product being promoted.
When we began investigating this claim, we found it on a blog that was posted by an advertiser on another cartoon publisher’s site. Webtoon’s Content Rules on cartooning already stated that webtoons could not contain commercials or any other form of advertising, even if the ad was embedded into the comic, but this author just wanted more evidence to back up their claim. We also noticed that the blog said “clearly” and that we could read the entire post.
We decided to see what we could find about the comic. First, we learned that the post did not contain any advertisements. Next, we discovered that there was no commercial inside the comic and that the comic had no expiration date. We then checked the site itself to see if the author had a disclaimer or copyright statement.
The article’s author’s name was Sue Pierce, and the blog’s domain was blogsofcelebrities.com. Therefore, Sue Pierce’s statements were not verified.
Now, we are seeing posts from authors using more “sales-type” language and mentioning names, brands, and products. We also notice that authors are beginning to refer to themselves and their sites as “branded.”
We have also been concerned about the way Webtoon handles user feedback, so we decided to take a closer look at this particular webtoon. We wanted to know if Sue Pierce was saying that she has already tried some of the sponsored webtoons and that she knew that there were no problems with the sponsored sites. So we searched the Web to see what those stories were, because we wanted to verify her claims, but we still couldn’t find any.
Although we think Sue Pierce should have made it clear that this statement is not a Webtoon Safe Playground Policy, we believe that other cartoonists who don’t understand the difference between webtoons and actual books should read the rules, which are explicitly stated on every webtoon’s Webpage, before making any claims about the quality of their works. of their own brand.